DALL-E vs Flux Comparison

DALL-E and Flux take different paths when it comes to creating images using artificial intelligence. The team at Cabina.AI has put together a list of the main differences between these two models based on what they've learned. We hope this helps you make the right choice.

DALL-E excels at turning text into detailed images. It understands complex descriptions and creates art that matches specific requests. The tool handles various styles, from photorealistic to abstract art. Recent updates let users edit existing images and extend them beyond their original borders.

Flux focuses on creating consistent images across multiple generations. It's good at making images that look like they belong in the same set. The tool helps users maintain a specific style or brand identity. Its latest features include better face generation and more control over image details.

Both tools serve different needs. DALL-E works well for single, unique images with specific requirements. It's ideal for creating standalone artwork or illustrations. Flux shines when you need multiple related images that share a common look.

The choice between them depends on your goals. If you need one perfect image that matches exact specifications, DALL-E might be better. For creating a series of related images with consistent style, Flux could be the better pick.

Flux vs DALL-E

	Flux	DALL-E
Made by	Black Forest	OpenAI
Chatbot name	Flux AI	Dall-E 3
Main models	flux-schnell flux-realism flux-dev (Latest) flux-pro	dall-e-3 Latest dall-e-2
Supported Formats	Images (JPG, PNG)	Images (JPG, PNG)
Free version	Limited version available with basic features	Yes
Paid Version	$12 / month	$20 / month as part of ChatGPT Plus
API	Yes	Yes, paid version
Sign in	Registration through user account	Email
Unique features	Open-source, high level of customization and collaboration	Integration with ChatGPT for text-to-image generation, strong in creating realistic compositions.

Our advice

Best uses for Flux

Technical Illustrators

Flux excels in generating detailed and accurate images for technical documentation and presentations.

Product Designers

Flux can produce high-quality product visualizations, helping to showcase designs accurately before production.

Architects

Flux is excellent for architectural renderings, providing realistic depictions of projects during the design phase.

Event Planners

Flux can help design promotional materials, invitations, and other graphics that require high realism and detail.

Advertising Agencies

Flux is suitable for producing realistic imagery for campaigns that require precise representation of products.

Best uses for DALL-E

Graphic Designers

DALL-E is great for creating imaginative visuals, logos, and marketing materials with unique artistic flair.

Marketers

The Cabina.AI team recommends DALL-E for produce eye-catching graphics that resonate with your brand's identity and messaging.

Content Creators

From social media posts to blog illustrations, DALL-E generates engaging visuals that enhance online content.

Writers

DALL-E is useful for generating illustrations for book covers or character designs, bringing narratives to life visually.

Educators

DALL-E can create vibrant educational visuals that capture students' attention and enhance learning materials.

F.A.Q: DALL-E vs Flux?

How to make Detailed Comparison DALL-E vs Flux?

To compare DALL-E and Flux in detail, use Cabina.AI compare mode. This feature lets you quickly and easily look at these two AI image generation platforms side by side, and it's free to use.

What are DALL-E and Flux?

DALL-E is an AI image generator developed by OpenAI that excels in creating intricate and imaginative images from text prompts. Flux, developed by Black Forest Labs, is a versatile image generation model with a focus on high accuracy and customization.

Can I generate text within images using both models?

Both models can generate text within images, but DALL-E has been noted to struggle with coherent text generation compared to Flux, which excels in producing readable text.

How do the processing times compare?

DALL-E typically has longer processing times (10-15 seconds per image), while Flux models like Flux-Schnell can generate images in about 1-1.5 seconds.

Which model should I choose for professional use?

If you need high realism and customization, Flux-Pro would be ideal for professional applications. For creative projects where ease of use is crucial, DALL-E would be a better choice.

AI journey starts here

Work with DALL-E vs Flux in one window parallel & free

TRY NOW

compare DALL-E vs Flux