7 Best Midjourney Alternatives for 2025

Midjourney is an image generator designed to create various types of content. With its help, you can make a high-quality image for social media, art sketches, comic book pictures, and many other variations of visual content using just a few lines of text description.

Yes, Midjourney is included in various ratings of top services of this type, but for some users, this AI assistant is not enough. Some people dislike that the assistant is only accessible through Discord. Others are dissatisfied with the set of functions or the quality of the images, and some want to get more from the free version of the generator.

So, such people start looking for Midjourney alternatives. If you belong to this category of users, we are here to help you.

We at Cabina.AI carefully tested a large number of platforms with identical or similar functionality and selected for you a list of the best Midjourney alternatives. Below, we will examine these alternatives, highlighting their positive and negative aspects.

Evaluation Criteria

We did not choose alternative AI tools randomly; we did not rely solely on personal subjective experience and reviews from other users. To find the best offers on the market, our specialists used a complex approach and paid special attention to a specific set of factors. Now we will tell you about them.

Specific Functionalities

Although all tools on the list belong to the category of image generators, they have distinct functionalities. For example, they differ in editing capabilities, the variety of supported genres and templates, and speed of work, among other factors. We paid special attention to technical aspects.

Cost and plans

If a tool is unreasonably expensive, we, of course, ignore such platforms, because many alternatives to Midjourney AI have more than acceptable pricing plans. We do not want our readers to overpay.

Additionally, a key factor for us is the variety of plans. There should be optimal options for “regular” users who create visual content for entertainment and social networks, and professionals who use images in their work and, accordingly, have special requirements for generators.

How easy to use

You don’t want to face a puzzle, do you? Sure, you don’t. We selected online tools that feature an intuitive and straightforward interface, requiring no special technical skills or experience from the user. So don’t worry: by choosing any of the presented services, you will not encounter any problems during use.

7 Best Midjourney Alternatives to Use in 2025

Cabina.AI

Let’s not keep the intrigue for long. In our opinion, this is the best Midjourney alternative available on the market. The distinctive feature of this service is that it supports many models for generating visual content. That means you register and use one platform, but benefit from the services of several AI assistants. Convenient, isn’t it?

Key features

After registration, you log in to your account and gain access to various generation models, such as Flux, Stable Diffusion, and Luma. You do not need to subscribe to each Midjourney equivalent. Cabina.AI has its payment system. Tokens represent it. Each generation costs a certain number of tokens. On average, 1.4.

This payment system is much more profitable than classic subscriptions because you pay only for the direct use of a specific generator. If you actively use, let’s say, 10 models, in a month you pay 10-15 times less than if you paid for separate subscriptions.

Support for multiple models, among other things, allows you to conveniently conduct a comparison of the results. You enter one prompt, load it into different models, get the results, and immediately choose the better option.

Pricing information

If you are not an active user of AI generators, you can easily use the free plan. Immediately after registration, you will receive 100 tokens. Additionally, you will be credited with 10 or more tokens daily. This is enough for occasional use of AI assistants.

If you plan to use a Midjourney equivalent more actively, choose a paid plan that suits your needs.

• Starter. $4.99 monthly. 450 tokens (about 625 pictures);
• Basic. $9.99 monthly. 1000 tokens (1400 pictures);
• Growth. $18.99 monthly. 2100 tokens (3000 pictures);
• Premium. $99.99 monthly. 14000 tokens (19500 pictures).

You can skip the monthly subscription and get as many tokens as you need to solve current tasks. For example, to get 249 tokens, you need to pay $3. This is roughly enough for 300 generations. A very profitable offer.

Pros/Cons

Pros:

• vast possibilities of the free version;
• no need to buy monthly subscriptions (you can pay with tokens as needed);
• “all-in-one” concept;
• the ability to quickly and conveniently compare the results of different generation models;
• simple and intuitive interface;
• a library where generated content is saved.

Cons:

• dependence on the servers where the models operate. For example, if profound changes are made to the API, some time may be needed to adapt to the new conditions;
• the token system may be unusual for people who are used to buying monthly subscriptions. There is a need to monitor the number of remaining tokens and make transactions when they run out.

DALL-E 3

This is the third generation of the image generator by OpenAI. It currently holds one of the leading market positions. This alternative to Midjourney is renowned for its exceptional ability to interpret even highly complex prompts accurately. The image quality is excellent, even when the user doesn’t specify many details in the text description.

The assistant can be integrated into ChatGPT Plus. It makes it more convenient for users who frequently and intensively use the model.

Key features

This is an excellent option for people accustomed to using ChatGPT, offering the same interface, AI communication style, and nuances in prompt formulation. The key highlight of the service is its ability to understand truly complex prompts. The AI was trained on earlier models (like DALL·E 2, launched back in 2022).

Users typically have no complaints about the quality of the visual content. The images are entirely suitable for professional use.

Pricing information

As for the cost, it’s straightforward: the price depends on the quality you want to achieve. There are two options.

• Standard quality. 1024×1024: $0.04 per image. 1024×1792: $0.08 per image.
• HD Quality. 1024×1024: $0.08 per image. 1024×1792: $0.12 per image.

ChatGPT Plus users can access DALL·E 3 as part of their monthly subscription. No additional payment required. When using the assistant via API, the token system applies (as described earlier).

Pros/Cons

Pros:

• this Midjourney alternative is one of the best in terms of prompt understanding. You can be almost 100% sure the assistant will deliver the visual content you wanted;
• a high-quality built-in editor that allows immediate changes of generated images;
• integrated into ChatGPT, which is great news for experienced users of this AI model;
• strong emphasis on photorealism. If you’re aiming for images that are nearly indistinguishable from real photos, DALL-E 3 is worth trying.

Cons:

• content moderation policies typical of ChatGPT and OpenAI. Even seemingly harmless prompts might be declined “just in case;”
• if you don’t have a ChatGPT Plus subscription, you’ll need to top up your balance regularly for new generations;
• relatively poor performance with images containing multiple objects. Sometimes, contours are drawn incorrectly, one object may visually “connect” with another, and so on. DALL-E 3 is best suited for creating images that contain 1-5 objects.

Stable Diffusion 3

This is the best Midjourney alternative in terms of openness and customization. This was the original concept of Stability AI, which is responsible for creating this assistant. The project team used an open-source version. This model opens up significantly more opportunities for customization than its competitors listed here. 

It is also worth noting the methods of artificial intelligence training. The developers used Flow Matching Training, which demonstrated excellent results. The assistant perfectly understands simple prompts and massive text descriptions with special requirements for the quality of the content.

Key features

Overall, the developers have paid considerable attention to teaching artificial intelligence to understand human requests. In addition to the aforementioned Flow Matching Training, the Diffusion Transformer (DiT) and Multimodal Transformer architectures were also used (the same feature is used in ChatGPT). 

Sounds complicated? Probably. The primary thing to understand is that Stable Diffusion 3, due to its complex approach, is one of the most accurate assistants on the market for converting text into images.

Pricing information

This service also uses a credit-based system. On average, one generation costs 6.5 credits.

Here are the plans.

• Standard. $9/month – 900 credits.
• Pro. $19/month – 1900 credits.
• Plus. $49/month – 5500 credits.
• Premium. $99/month – 12000 credits.

For example, if you purchase the Plus plan but run out of credits, you can buy Standard credits separately in the same month. This is not prohibited.

Stability AI offers a discount to users who purchase a yearly subscription in a single transaction. In this case, you will pay only for 10 months of use and get 2 months as a bonus. For example, a yearly Pro subscription costs $190.

Pros/Cons

Pros:

• users receive credits that can be used not only for visual content but also for audio, text, and other models from Stability AI;
• very strong understanding of complex and lengthy prompts;
• API allows creation of a local server with the same functionality;
• the basic plan, priced at just $9/month, gives many generations.

Cons:

• technical setup can be challenging for some users, especially when creating a local server;
• relatively slow image generation speed. Particularly when a high-quality result is requested.

Google Image 3

This is a continuation of the Imagen line from Google DeepMind, which demonstrated its first developments in 2022. Over three years, the developers successfully achieved excellent photorealism, high generation speed, even for complex projects, and a variety of stylistic solutions.

This product falls into the category of alternatives to Midjourney, which produce a minimal number of artifacts, even when it comes to complex prompts and large numbers of objects in the image.

Key features

This model has significantly outperformed many competitors, such as Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, in showing text on images. Even when it comes to miniature inscriptions, they are displayed perfectly. The same applies to human anatomy. Google Image 3 creates such images without artifacts, with the exception of rare cases.

In their new products, developers use advanced language models. There is no exact information, but experts believe that it is PaLM 2 or Gemini. This approach has improved the accuracy of displaying text requests as visual content.

Pricing information

The ability to use this model for free is provided by tools such as ImageFX, Gemini, and Vertex AI. The number of free generations depends on the complexity of the projects and server load.

Paid plans are available to Gemini subscribers. Gemini plans differ for individuals and businesses. Let’s look at two examples each.

For personal use:

• Gemini Advanced. $19.99 per month. Ability to generate higher quality content thanks to access to the Gemini 1.5 Pro model. 2 TB of storage in Google One. Access to Gemini in Google Workspace apps (Gmail, Docs, Drive, Sheets, Slides).
• Gemini AI Ultra. $249.99 per month (for new users, a 50% discount applies in the first three months). Additional benefits include access to the most advanced Gemini algorithms, including those in the testing stage, 30 TB of storage, and a YouTube Premium subscription.

For entrepreneurs:

• Starter. $6 per user per month (prices listed for annual subscription). Up to 100 users. 30 GB of storage for each of them. Shared access to Google functionality (Docs, Sheets, Slides, Drive, Calendar, etc).
• Business Standard. $12 per user per month. Up to 150 users, with 2 TB of storage per user. Additional benefits: meeting recording, noise suppression, polls, and Q&A in Meet.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

• especially high quality of text on images;
• high quality of human anatomy;
• the possibility of free use through third-party models;
• use of new language models that allow the assistant to better understand user needs.

Cons:

• strict censorship policy;
• use of watermarking in all plans to help in recognizing generated content;
• relatively complex payment scheme, direct link with Gemini.
  

Flux AI

This is a product by Black Forest Labs. The main goal the developers set was to create a model that would achieve stunning photorealism of generated images. The project team succeeded. This model became a source of visual content that is impossible or extremely difficult to distinguish from real. So, if realism is your top priority, Flux AI is worth your attention.

Key features

One of the features of the model is client orientation. Users can easily switch between two modes. The first mode is basic. In this case, images are generated quickly, retaining “ordinary”, basic quality. The second mode is advanced. In this case, Flux AI produces professional-quality content.

Another focus of the developers was versatility. This AI model excels at creating a diverse range of images, from classic avatars for social networks to historical-style illustrations, from modern marketing solutions to cartoon characters.

Pricing information

A distinctive feature of Flux AI is the presence of a completely free unlimited plan. It is available to representatives of the education sector (students and teachers). When registering, it is necessary to enter the educational institution’s email address or contact support.

If you are not related to the education sector, you will have access to a 14-day free trial period. After this period ends, you will be able to choose one of the paid plans. There are four types.

• Starter. $15 per month. Up to 50 private projects, unlimited public projects, and 50 free Copilot Credits/month.
• Pro. $39 per month. Unlimited private projects, unlimited public projects, unlimited commenters & up to 20 editors, 150 free Copilot Credits/month.
• Team. $49 per month. In addition to the mentioned advantages: shared workspace for the team, shared Copilot Credits, centralized user management, centralized billing, and verified business profile.
• Enterprise. Custom pricing. Hidden workspaces, enhanced privacy & security, advanced export formats (JEP30), security audits, vendor signup, and invoiced billing.

The availability of paid plans for various user types is another advantage of this product.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

• availability of a fast image generation mode, which saves a lot of time for users who do not need professional quality visual content;
• simple algorithm for receiving very high-quality images (just choose Pro Ultra quality);
• very simple interface and usage algorithm;
• diverse paid plans;
• free use for students and teachers;
• quite long trial period (2 weeks).

Cons:

• waiting for a Pro Ultra quality image can take 10 minutes or more;
• sometimes there are mistakes in showing human anatomy (the human body in the image looks unrealistic);
• usage costs can accumulate quickly.

Ideogram 2.0

This is a versatile Midjourney AI alternative. At least, the developers of this product position it this way. The AI assistant excels at creating visual content for various purposes, ranging from simple images for social networks to high-quality visuals suitable for large-scale marketing campaigns.

The developers do not stop there. For example, there was a release of the Ideogram iOS app, the beta version of the Ideogram API, and Ideogram Search. In short, work on improving the generator is constantly ongoing.

Key features

The second version of Ideogram performs complex prompts much better than its predecessor. The user can create a large text description that specifies the most minor requirements for the content itself and its quality. As practice shows, the tool successfully implements such complex projects.

It is a relatively free Midjourney alternative. There is a free option for using the tool without a time limit. Limits are updated weekly. The exact number of generations per day is not specified. As is often the case, limits depend on server load and project complexity.

All cases of free use fall under the category of “slow generations.” This means that such users wait in the queue, without having priority.

Pricing information

If you want to receive a precise number of generations per month and the ability to use priority generations, you can choose one of the plans listed below. These are options for individuals.

• Basic. $8 per month ($7 when buying a yearly subscription). 400 priority credits/month. 100 slow credits/day (in this case, unlike the previous one, you have to wait in a queue). Edit in Canvas, no image upload (you can work only with generated content).
• Plus. $20 per month ($16 when buying a yearly subscription). Everything in the Basic plan, plus: 1000 priority credits/month, unlimited slow credits, an opportunity to upload and edit your images, and private generation.
• Pro. $60 per month ($48 when buying a yearly subscription). Additional benefits: 3500 priority credits/month, Batch Generation.

These are plans for businesses.

• Team. Minimum two users. $30 per user monthly ($25 when buying a yearly subscription). In addition to the previously mentioned Plus plan, you get 1,500 priority credits per user/month, central billing and administration, Batch Generation, early access to collaboration features.
• Enterprise. For companies with custom generation and design needs. It has a custom price (contact the support team). Benefits: private custom models trained on your visual data, custom credit amounts, volume discounts on API, and priority customer support.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

• API;
• full-fledged iOS app;
• high speed even for complex projects;
• availability of two types of generation: slow and priority. If you can afford to wait, there is an option to save priority generations.

Cons:

• lack of additional functions in the free version (such as an editor for generated images);
• watermarks during free use;
• prompts written not in English are sometimes implemented incorrectly.

Leonardo AI

This generator has a specific niche. It performs best in creating high-quality visual content for games, concept art, illustrations, and images of fictional worlds. In short, the developers decided to occupy a market segment where other generators cannot perform optimally. But of course, this tool can also create classic pictures. It handles long, complex queries effectively.

Key features

The generator has good options for content personalization. It allows users to control the style, color palette, genre, and even abstract elements such as the atmosphere of the setting. The resulting content can be changed using the Canvas Editor. It provides extensive image editing capabilities.

The tool supports the Custom Models function. This means you can train artificial intelligence on custom models, enabling your future projects to become more effective.

Pricing information

The tool is available for free. In this case, you will receive 150 tokens per day and have access to limited functionality. The cost of an image in tokens depends on the complexity of the project.

Paid plans:

• Apprentice. $10 per month. 8,500 tokens. No watermark, fast generation;
• Artisan. $24 per month. 25,000 tokens. Personal model functionality is unlocked;
• Maestro. $48 per month. 60,000 tokens. Priority generation without a queue;
• Enterprise. Price is determined individually. API access, functionality for large teams, dedicated servers.

When paying for a yearly subscription in one payment, the user receives a 20% discount.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

• the tool performs especially well in unusual fields, for example, in gaming;
• the ability for an average user to benefit from Leonardo AI for free (if basic images are needed);
• high-quality editor for generated images;
• availability of custom AI model training functionality;
• high image quality.

Cons:

• significantly limited functionality of the free version;
• user complaints about excessively long generation times during peak periods;
• setting up custom models is a complex process for a standard user.

FAQ